At first glance, the viral image looks harmless—just a worn pair of shorts with visible damage. But once paired with the provocative caption, “How many holes you see determines if you’re a narcissist,” the image instantly shifts from casual scrolling to focused inspection. That mental snap is exactly why the puzzle spread so quickly. It challenges perception, pokes at ego, and invites viewers to test how confident they are in what they think they see.
Despite the dramatic framing, the image isn’t meant to diagnose or label anyone. Its real power lies in showing how differently people interpret the same visual information—and how quickly we commit to conclusions. Most people answer almost immediately, spotting the two torn areas on the legs and confidently saying “two.” That response reflects instinctive perception: the brain prioritizes the most obvious shapes and delivers a fast, clean answer.
Then the conversation deepens. Others point out that the shorts already contain openings by design: two leg openings and one waist opening. When those are added to the two tears, the total becomes five. For many, this feels like the most complete and logical answer. But some take the analysis even further, considering fabric depth. If the torn holes pass through both the front and back layers, they might be counted twice—pushing the number to seven or even nine, depending on how literally the construction is interpreted.
The claim about narcissism is what fuels debate, not truth. The image thrives because it sparks disagreement and comparison. Choosing two suggests quick, instinctive thinking. Choosing five reflects structural awareness and balance. Choosing seven or more often points to layered, analytical reasoning. None of these indicate personality traits or disorders. What the puzzle truly reveals isn’t who you are—it’s how you think, how deeply you analyze, and how strongly you defend your reasoning. And that conversation, far more than the shorts themselves, is what makes the image impossible to ignore.